|
|
 |
Massacre Exposes America’s Dirty Campus Secret
As people struggle to understand the violence of the murders at
Virginia Tech, NAM writer Earl Ofari Hutchinson suggests it reflects a
growing trend in campus violence.
New America Media, News Analysis, Earl Ofari
Hutchinson, Posted: Apr 17, 2007
There were two monstrous tragedies at Virginia Tech. The first was
the colossal shock and horror of the murder of 33 people. The second was
that as monstrous as the rampage was, it is only the most extreme form
of the violence that has quietly torn many campuses apart. The
exhaustive white paper on campus violence issued by the American College
Health Association in 2005 was an early warning that campus violence is
a far bigger problem than many campus officials are willing to admit.
The report found that many campuses are not the safe and idyllic bastion
of student tranquility and peace that campus administrators like to
present to prospective students, parents, alumni, donors and the general
public. The white paper ticked off a high rate of rapes, assaults,
physical harassment, taunting, stalking, and suicides that plague many
college campuses.
However, the 23 murders or non-negligent manslaughters that have taken
place on American campuses was only the tip of iceberg of campus
violence. Only 25 percent of the violent crimes were actually reported.
A significant number of faculty and students flatly told the researchers
that they actually feared for their safety. One of their biggest fears
was gun violence.
This was not unfounded. Guns were involved in more than one-third of all
violent student crimes. Researchers also blamed the continued and
possibly escalating campus violence on “male competition and
aggression.” In almost all cases, the shooters and aggressors were male.
The student killer was typically profiled as a frustrated, socially
isolated male who killed to settle a grudge with a professor or a failed
sexual or love relationship with another student. Police officials
speculate that this might have been the possible motive of the Virginia
Tech killer.
In some cases, alcohol or drugs were involved, and the inevitable finger
of blame was pointed at the pervasive violence in movies and videogames
that many male students obsessively play and enjoy. The white paper
recommended that campus officials implement or drastically overhaul
their anti-violence programs. That includes better student screening
programs, targeted educational programs for faculty clergy and student
resident advisors, expanded on-site counseling, beefed up student
support networks, and 24-hour student access to emergency services.
The major danger, however, continued to be student and faculty silence
in reporting the crimes, and the tendency of administrators to gloss
over of the crimes that occurred. The catch-22 failure of many
administrators to aggressively encourage students and faculty members to
report crimes, especially violent crimes, deeply affects the ability of
some colleges to recruit and retain students. A victim of a violent
attack often finds that the trauma affects their classroom performance.
The white paper was a landmark study of campus violence and its causes.
It should have been a wake-up call for campus officials to do and say
more about the danger of campus attacks, but that wasn’t the case.
Campus officials were mostly mute on it; the report drew almost no media
coverage, and quickly passed from the public’s radar.
There will be intensive official investigations into what went wrong,
why the killings happened, and what Virginia Tech officials did or
didn’t do to stop them. That will tell much about whether the students
were right to hammer school officials for the sharply raised body count.
But if the students are right in their bitter charges it’s only the
latest - though by far deadliest - in the pattern of turning a blind eye
to deadly violence on campuses. That’s the dirty secret that the
Virginia Tech horror terribly exposed.
Hutchinson's new book The Latino Challenge to Black America:
Towards a Conversation between African-Americans and Hispanics (Middle
Passage Press and Hispanic Economics New York) in English and Spanish
will be out in October. |
Pacific News Service
|
|
Copyright by Pacific News Service and New American Media. All
rights reserved.
Founded in 1969, Pacific News Service is a nonprofit media
organization dedicated to bringing the seldom heard, often most
misunderstood or ignored voices and ideas into the public forum. PNS
produces a daily news syndicate and sponsors magazine articles,
books, TV segments and films.
New American Media (formerly New
California Media) is a nationwide association of over 700 ethnic
media organizations representing the development of a more inclusive
journalism. Founded in 1996 by Pacific News Service, NAM promotes
ethnic media through
events
such as the Ethnic Media Expo and Ethnic Media Awards,
a
National Directory of Ethnic Media, and such initiatives as the online feature
Exchange Headlines from Ethnic Media,
offering top headlines digested from
ethnic media worldwide, updated five days a week.
IMDiversity.com is committed to presenting diverse points of view.
However, the viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of
the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or
employees at IMD.
|
|